Sheep--sometimes viewed positively [<--? depends on your stance], i.e. Biblical references to the Lord being a shepherd, and the believers as sheep. At the same time, this could be negative, suggesting human weaknesses, since sheep are: dumb, directionless, defenseless
†.
Is it arrogant to look down upon the masses with social criticism that decries their decline? For example, I find it exceedingly annoying to think that other people are so caught up in the life of celebrities and things that touch our lives where it pertains to entertainment. Granted, entertainment does matter and does shape us, but the things that are focused on generally aren't the aspects of the entertainment that do enrich us. The Yahoo!® front page is constantly putting under the "Featured" content celeb gossip. Really now? Maybe I should just find a different website for my source of news (but as a sentimental person, I hesitate to part from my mailbox of several years). How about putting things that matter in the featured content? It isn't necessary to make the world boring with "matters of consequence"‡, i.e. numerical statistics (which actually are often fascinating and/or depressing) or business-y things. Honestly, I find StumbleUpon to be far more enriching than the Y! front page. People reach for dime novels that are the same in essence with modified specifics rather than classics or books that require thinking.
Oh wait, I just stumbled upon another one (sheep related re: Asch, group-thinksy/bystander apathy, etc. [many of these experiments are now considered unethical, so there are stricter standards out there nowadays!], & related to criticism and people).
I guess the thing I have the biggest complaint about is the decline in curiosity/excitement of discovery in many people. I have a feeling that school is part way to blame, because learning is associated with homework/stress. But then again we are the ones falsely associating those things.
So the sheep argument. Fair or not fair? It has always been something that has existed, though the advent of mass-media has definitely expanded the size of the mass. So perhaps at that way, we haven't declined, our masses have just conglomerated together. But in some ways it isn't bad to think alike, such as with certain moral standards.
Then again, we'd all like to think we are original, and we are thinkers. But there are limitations to that all. Is it even possible to have an original thought? Beyond those new cutting edge discoveries in science (etc.) where new terminology is being formed, can we think original thoughts with the material we already have?
But then again, when I dual enrolled at the local community college during high school, I took a class in which most of the class spazzed out at the thought of having to learn about things that looked complicated. They started screaming and twitching when our professor joked about teaching about photosynthesis and the photosystems II and I (numbered according to the order discovered
). Brittany and I laughed because we had learned about that a year ago from that time, when we were juniors. I kind of lost a little faith in people that day.
Oh, digression. From the psychology link:
"Though to be fair, if you were late for a
class, did your professor ever accept, "I had to stop and help a
wounded traveler" as an excuse? Probably not unless you could produce
the guy's blood-stained shirt as evidence."
Brittany and I did stop for a baby bird on our way to that class to save it. We were late and missed the quiz, but our prof did let us make it up, and laughed at our honest excuse. We aced that class.
Another could be about how many intellectuals use their intelligence (and hence social awkwardness) as an excuse to not be able to communicate with people of average understanding.
Sure, some people really are more endowed naturally with dealing with people and situations; others, books and discovery. But people who are less cerebral are still forced to go to school (to a certain extent). So perhaps bookies like myself ought to learn to deal better with people.
I think I carry on alright despite my awkwardness.
But many doctors, scientists, & professors EPIC FAIL at communicating important information. & failure to communicate some information simply makes their work moot, until someone else can decipher it and make it accessible.